• Keyword
  • Volume/Page
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
 
   
 
 
Year Range: 
Search Issue | RSS Feeds RSS
Previous Issue

October 2004

Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 38-188

back to top
RSS Feeds

Identifying A Baseline for Teachers’ Astronomy Content Knowledge

Eric Brunsell and Jason Marcks

2004, AER, 3 (2), 38, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004015 | Cited 2 times

Online Publication Date: 07 February 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
A teacher’s scientific understanding has a dramatic impact on students’ ability to learn science. This article describes the results of administering the Astronomy Diagnostic Test to 142 science teachers in Wisconsin. The results show that these teachers are lacking a deep, coherent understanding of astronomy concepts. Implications for these results on professional development of in-service educators are suggested.
Show PACS
01.40.ek Secondary school
01.40.-d Education
01.40.J- Teacher training

Finding the Forest Amid the Trees: Tools for Evaluating Astronomy Education and Public Outreach Projects

Janelle M. Bailey and Timothy F. Slater

2004, AER, 3 (2), 47, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004016

Online Publication Date: 03 March 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
The effective evaluation of educational projects is becoming increasingly important to funding agencies and to the individuals and organizations involved in the projects. This brief “how-to” guide provides an introductory description of the purpose and basic ideas of project evaluation, and uses authentic examples from four different astronomy and earth∕space science projects to illustrate important ideas. Topics depicted include types of evaluation, selection of an evaluator, alignment of evaluation activities with project goals, and different methods of data collection in evaluation. A list of additional resources, including professional organizations and selected journals, is provided.
Show PACS
01.40.ek Secondary school
01.40.eg Elementary school
01.40.-d Education
01.75.+m Science and society

What Are Essential Concepts in “Astronomy 101”? A New Approach to Find Consensus from Two Different Samples of Instructors

Michael Zeilik and Vicky J. Morris-Dueer

2004, AER, 3 (2), 61, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004017 | Cited 3 times

Online Publication Date: 22 March 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
In the summers of 1997, 1998, and 1999, we gave attendees (N=44) at a workshop called Teaching Astronomy Conceptually a cognitive task: to rank 200 concepts often taught in “Astronomy 101.” Prior to these workshops, we asked an expert panel (N=18) of Astronomy 101 teachers to also rank these concepts. Among the workshop participants, the electromagnetic spectrum ranked the highest; among the expert panel, mass held the top spot. We then requested the expert panel to perform a cognitive task of judging the relatedness of pairs of terms, and ranked the results based on concepts that were most frequently chosen. We conclude that there is reasonable consensus about essential topics in Astro101 that can be reached using ranking and relatedness tasks.
Show PACS
01.40.ek Secondary school
01.40.-d Education
01.40.G- Curricula and evaluation
back to top
RSS Feeds

An Essential E-mail List Collection for Teaching Astronomy 101

Timothy F. Slater

2004, AER, 3 (2), 119, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004018

Online Publication Date: 11 April 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
With this short guide by AER Editorial Board member Tim Slater, we kick off a new series of opinion pieces to which we invite our readers’ response. Responses we deem most worthy of publication will be added to the original article on a timely basis. We reserve the right to edit the responses we publish for length and appropriateness. We also welcome suggestions for future opinion topics and volunteers who want to write one. So, if you agree or disagree with Tim Slater’s choices for the most useful e-mail lists, or have other suggestions to add to his list, let us hear from you.—Andrew Fraknoi and Sidney Wolff
Show PACS
01.40.ek Secondary school
01.40.-d Education
back to top
RSS Feeds

Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non–Science Majors

Edward E. Prather, Timothy F. Slater, Jeffrey P. Adams, Janelle M. Bailey, Lauren V. Jones, and Jack A. Dostal

2004, AER, 3 (2), 122, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004019 | Cited 11 times

Online Publication Date: 29 July 2004

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
The Lecture-Tutorial curriculum development project produced a set of 29 learner-centered classroom instructional materials for a large-enrollment introductory astronomy survey course for non-science majors. The Lecture-Tutorials are instructional materials intended for use by collaborative student learning groups, and are designed to be integrated into existing courses with conventional lectures. These instructional materials offer classroom-ready learner-centered activities that do not require any outside equipment or drastic course revision for implementation. Each 15-minute Lecture-Tutorial poses a sequence of conceptually challenging, Socratic dialogue-driven questions, along with graphs and data tables, all designed to encourage students to reason critically about difficult concepts in astronomy. The materials are based on research into student beliefs and reasoning difficulties, and use proven instructional strategies. The Lecture-Tutorials have been field-tested for effectiveness at various institutions, which represent a wide range of student populations and instructional settings. In addition to materials development, a second effort of this project focused on the assessment of changes in students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes toward learning astronomy as a result of both lecture and the subsequent use of Lecture-Tutorials. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were completed using a precourse, postlecture, and post-Lecture-Tutorial instrument, along with focus group interviews, respectively. Collectively, the evaluation data illustrate that conventional lectures alone helped students make statistically significant—yet unsatisfactory—gains in understanding (with students scoring at only the 50% level postlecture). Further, the data illustrate that the use of Lecture-Tutorials helped students achieve statistically significant gains beyond those attained after lecture (with students scoring at the 70% level post-Lecture-Tutorial). Quantitative evaluation of student attitudes showed no significant gains over the semester, but students reported that they considered the Lecture-Tutorials to be one of the most valuable components of the course.
Show PACS
01.40.-d Education

“Hot Seat” Questioning: A Technique to Promote and Evaluate Student Dialogue

Anthony Crider

2004, AER, 3 (2), 137, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004020

Online Publication Date: 26 October 2004

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
Several approaches have been proposed to include students in classroom dialogue, including “think-pair-share” and “talk to your neighbor.” I recently implemented an additional technique in which four students answer questions in a “Hot Seat” at the front of the classroom. An unforeseen by-product of this was student-initiated peer instruction outside of the classroom. A small case study (approximately 50 students) on the effect of the Hot Seat using the midterm exam showed that students were 9.5±3.2% more likely to correctly answer a question related to material covered while they occupied the Hot Seat. Analysis of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test revealed that they were twice as likely to learn their Hot Seat material. A survey revealed one likely reason: Students typically spent 15–60 additional minutes preparing for class on their two assigned Hot Seat dates. Curiously, students received no significant benefit (2.2±3.6%) from their second turn in the Hot Seat, possibly reflecting student immunization to its motivational pressure.

Teaching Astronomy Online

Mary L. Radnofsky and Matthew Bobrowsky

2004, AER, 3 (2), 148, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004021

Online Publication Date: 27 January 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
This article is intended to provide an overview of the practical, pedagogical, and philosophical considerations in designing a Web-based astronomy course, and to demonstrate the educational benefits that such online courses can afford students. Because online students need to take more responsibility for their learning, faculty must make course expectations extremely clear. Online education allows for increased student participation and equal access to college by such groups as the military, the handicapped, full-time employees, and rural and senior citizens. Teaching the sciences online—especially astronomy—gives students more time to think critically about new information. This article also includes tools, checklists, and resources helpful for introducing faculty to online course development in astronomy.
Show PACS
01.40.-d Education
01.40.G- Curricula and evaluation
01.40.Di Course design and evaluation
01.40.J- Teacher training
01.40.gb Teaching methods and strategies
01.50.H- Computers in education

The Internet Telescope: Remote Observing for the City Astronomy Class

Lor Gehret, Wayne Winters, and Steven Coberly

2004, AER, 3 (2), 170, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004022 | Cited 1 time

Online Publication Date: 11 January 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
The Latin School of Chicago is a college preparatory day school that involves its students in a number of astronomy initiatives. Here we report on our high school students’ use of the New Mexico Skies Internet telescope. Using a Web browser, our astronomy students are able to control a Celestron C-14 coupled with a CCD camera to image deep sky objects. In Chicago, using the Internet telescope teaches students how to request time on a shared instrument and how to plan an observing program, and it provides many varied independent study project and classroom options. Students use this instrument during our spring astronomy project week trip, when they travel to live and work at the New Mexico Skies Guest Observatory to learn observational astronomy, remote observing, and CCD imaging. Other remote observing programs that provide similar options are referenced, some with different or multiple instruments, some with limited access, and some with open access. Sample student images taken with the New Mexico Skies Internet telescope are included.
Show PACS
01.40.ek Secondary school
01.75.+m Science and society
01.40.-d Education
01.40.G- Curricula and evaluation
01.50.My Demonstration experiments and apparatus
01.50.Pa Laboratory experiments and apparatus
01.52.+r National and international laboratory facilities
01.40.gb Teaching methods and strategies
01.50.H- Computers in education

Assessment of Teaching Approaches in an Introductory Astronomy College Classroom

William R. Alexander

2004, AER, 3 (2), 178, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004023

Online Publication Date: 11 March 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Show Abstract
In recent years, there have been calls from the astronomy education research community for the increased use of learner-centered approaches to teaching, and systematic assessments of various teaching approaches using such tools as the Astronomy Diagnostic Test 2.0 (ADT 2.0). The research presented is a response to both calls. The ADT 2.0 was used in a modified form to obtain baseline assessments of introductory college astronomy classes that were taught in a traditional, mostly didactic manner. The ADT 2.0 (modified) was administered both before and after the completion of the courses. The courses were then altered to make modest use of learner-centered lecture tutorials. The ADT 2.0 (modified) was again administered before and after completion of the modified courses. Overall, the modest learner-centered approach showed mixed statistical results, with an increase in effect size (from medium to large), but no change in normalized gain index (both were low). Additionally, a mathematically rigorous approach showed no statistically significant improvements in conceptual understanding compared with a mathematically nonrigorous approach. This study will interpret the results from a variety of perspectives. The overall implementation of the lecture tutorials and their implications for teaching will also be discussed.
Show PACS
01.40.-d Education
01.50.Pa Laboratory experiments and apparatus
01.40.Fk Research in physics education
01.40.gb Teaching methods and strategies

Who Subscribes to the Astronomy Education Review?

Sidney C. Wolff and Andrew Fraknoi

2004, AER, 3 (2), 187, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004024

Online Publication Date: 08 February 2005

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF

Abstract Unavailable
Close
ADVERTISEMENT

close