• Keyword
  • Volume/Page
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
 
   
 
 

2004, AER, 3 (2), 38, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2004015

Identifying A Baseline for Teachers’ Astronomy Content Knowledge

Published 7 February 2005

Eric Brunsell and Jason Marcks

Space Education Initiatives

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | View Cart
A teacher’s scientific understanding has a dramatic impact on students’ ability to learn science. This article describes the results of administering the Astronomy Diagnostic Test to 142 science teachers in Wisconsin. The results show that these teachers are lacking a deep, coherent understanding of astronomy concepts. Implications for these results on professional development of in-service educators are suggested.

© 2005 Eric Brunsell. Copyright assigned to the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 28 May 2004
Published online 07 February 2005

    References

  1. Adams, J. P., & Slater, T. F. 2000, Astronomy in the National Science Education Standards, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48(1), 39.
  2. Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. 1996, Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of the Causes of Seasons, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 33, 553.
  3. Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. 2003, A Review of Astronomy Education Research, Astronomy Education Review, 2(2), 20AERSCZ000002000002000020000001.
  4. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. 2000, Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California, Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294.
  5. Demming, G. 2002, Results from the Astronomy Diagnostic Test National Project, Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 52AERSCZ000001000001000052000001.
  6. Gess-Newsome, J. 2001, The Professional Development of Science Teachers for Science Education Reform: A Review of Research, In Professional Development Planning and Design, J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Editors). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  7. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. 1996, The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement, Rev. Educ. Res., 66, 361.
  8. Hufnagel, B. 2002, Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test, Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 47AERSCZ000001000001000047000001.
  9. Mosenthal, J. H., & Ball, D. L. 1992, Constructing New Forms of Teaching: Subject Matter Knowledge in In-Service Teacher Education, Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 347.
  10. National Research Council. 1996, National Science Education Standards, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press.
  11. National Science Board. 2004, Science and Engineering Indicators 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
  12. Schmidt, W. H. 2001, Defining Teacher Quality Through Content: Professional Development Implications From TIMSS, In Professional Development Planning and Design, J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Editors). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  13. Slater, T. F., Safko, J. L., & Carpenter, J. R. 1999, Long-Term Attitude Sustainability from a Constructivist-Based Astronomy-for-Teachers Course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 47, 366.
  14. Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. 2002, Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Moon Phases Before and After Instruction, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 39(7), 633. [ISI]
  15. Zeilik, M. 2003, Birth of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test: Prototest Evolution, Astronomy Education Review, 1(2), 46AERSCZ000001000002000046000001.



Close
ADVERTISEMENT

close