2006, AER, 5 (2), 5, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2006016
Different Reward Structures to Motivate Student Interaction with Electronic Response Systems in Astronomy
Published 19 October 2006
Electronic response systems (“clickers”) are used in introductory astronomy classes as a real-time assessment tool. Different reward structures for student responses to clicker questions are used to motivate individual participation or group collaboration before responding. The impact of two reward structures on student behavior and learning is investigated. This study finds that a success-bonus incentive (in which individual participation points are doubled when the class attains a threshold success rate) strongly motivated students to collaborate, whereas a participation-only credit (no success-bonus) incentive resulted in one-third of the students answering individually without collaboration. With a participation-only incentive, students who answered individually (“self-testers”) were found to have more positive attitudes toward astronomy and science, and higher self-confidence in their learning than students who interacted before answering without a success-bonus incentive (“collaborators”). These collaborators experienced downward shifts in attitudes and self-confidence, in contrast to the static attitudes and self-confidence of self-testers. The implication is that students with little or no background in science prefer to answer collaboratively rather than independently and that these students are also negatively impacted by a one-semester introductory astronomy course.
© 2006 Patrick M. Len. Copyright assigned to the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.
PUBLICATION DATA
ISSN
1539-1515 (online)
ARTICLE DATA
History
Received 17 May 2006
Published online 19 October 2006
Published online 19 October 2006
Digital Object Identifier
- Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. 2001, Wireless Keypads in Lecture Classes, Phys. Teach., 39(1), 8PHTEAH000039000001000008000001.
- Duncan, D. 2006, Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise, Astronomy Education Review, 5(1), 70AERSCZ000005000001000070000001.
- Hufnagel, B. 2002, Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test, Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 47AERSCZ000001000001000047000001.
- Judson, E., & Sawada, D. 2002, Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167.
- Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. 2003, Peer Instruction Versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A Comparison of Two Interaction Methods in the Wired Classroom, Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 458.
- Zeilik, M., & Morris, V. J. 2003, An Examination of Misconceptions in an Astronomy Course for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors, Astronomy Education Review, 2(1), 101AERSCZ000002000001000101000001.
- See EPAPS supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2006016 for Appendices A–D in PDF format. [EPAPS]
Supplemental Files (EPAPS)
- len-appendixes.pdf (41 kB) 31-Jul-2009 17:40


This Publication
Scitation
SPIN
Google Scholar
PubMed