2009, AER, 8 (1), 010102, doi:10.3847/AER2009013
Advanced Undergraduate and Early Graduate Physics Students’ Misconception About Solar Wind Flow: Evidence of Students’ Difficulties in Distinguishing Paradigms
Published 12 March 2009
Anecdotal evidence has suggested that advanced undergraduate students confuse the spiral structure of the interplanetary magnetic field with the flow of the solar wind. Though it is a small study, this paper documents this misconception and begins to investigate the underlying issues behind it. We present evidence that the traditional presentation of this concept can lead to this misconception and that it persists into graduate school. Two consistent models of plasmas that apply under different circumstances are presented during the course. Evidence suggests that students attempt to apply the models to inappropriate circumstances, which leads to a misconception. There is also evidence that a fundamental mechanics misconception contributes to students’ difficulties. Finally, we argue that many of the broad conclusions of the research done at the introductory undergraduate level are applicable to upper division and graduate students. In particular, we conclude that direct instruction at this level through lecture-demonstration can leave students with misconceptions and even unintentionally reinforce those misconceptions.
© 2009 by The American Astronomical Society.
KEYWORDS and PACS
ARTICLE DATA
History
Received 07 April 2008
Published online 12 March 2009
Published online 12 March 2009
Permalink
- Baumjohann, W., and Treumann, R., 1997. Basic Space Plasma Physics, London: Imperial College Press.
- Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., and Beichner, R., 2006. “Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 2, 1, DOI:.
- Hake, R. R., 1998. “Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., 66, 64AJPIAS000066000001000064000001.
- Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G., 1992. “Force Concept Inventory,” Phys. Teach., 30, 141PHTEAH000030000003000141000001.
- Hughes, W. J., and Hudson, M. K., 2004. “Towards an integrated model of the space weather system,” J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 66, 1241
DOI:. - M. G. Kivelson, and C. T. Russell, eds., 1995. Introduction to Space Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lopez, R. E., 2008. “Space Physics and Teaching Undergradute Electromagnetism,” Adv. Space Res., 42, 1859
DOI:. - Lopez, R. E., and Gross, N. A., 2008. “Active Learning for Advanced Students: The Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling Graduate Summer School,” Adv. Space Res., 42, 1864
DOI:. - McDermott, L. C., 2001. “Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning,” Am. J. Phys., 69, 1127AJPIAS000069000011001127000001
DOI:. [ISI] - Morrow, C. A., Harold, J., and Dusenbery, P., 2005. “Science Communication Efforts in Space Weather: Benefits and Challenges of the `Weather' Analogy,” 2nd AMS Space Weather Symposium in 2005 (San Diego).
- NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center 2002. “The Solar Wind's Average Spiral Field,” http://lepmfi.gsfc.nasa.gov/mfi/lepedu/SpiralField.html.
- Odstrcil, D., 2003. “Modeling 3-D solar wind structure,” Adv. Space Res., 32, 497.
- Simpson, S., 2004. “Sun-to-Mud Education in Two Weeks,” Space Weather, 2, S07002
DOI:. - Tascione, T., 1994. Introduction to the Space Environment, 2nd ed., Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co.



This Publication
Scitation
SPIN
Google Scholar
PubMed