AER Banner
  • Keyword
  • Volume/Page
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
 
   
 
 
Astronomy Education Review / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS

2009, AER, 8 (1), 010103, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2009004

Clickers as Data Gathering Tools and Students’ Attitudes, Motivations, and Beliefs on Their Use in this Application

Published 19 March 2009

Edward E. Prather and Gina Brissenden

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | View Cart
Members of the Center for Astronomy Education (CAE) and the Conceptual Astronomy and Physics Education Research (CAPER) Team at the University of Arizona have conducted a systematic investigation into the use of wireless, electronic personal response systems (PRS), more commonly known as “clickers,” to gather research data in the large enrollment introductory astronomy course for nonscience majors (Astro 101). We describe a study and data, which support the assertion that clickers can be used as a data gathering tool for conducting “real-time” research on student learning in the classroom setting. We also present data suggesting that students believe the use of clickers (1) is beneficial to their understanding of course concepts; (2) contributes to improving their exam grades; and (3) increases their interest in course topics even when the clickers are being used solely as research data gathering tools rather than the more traditional application in which clickers are used as an instructional device to gather student votes as part of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) or Peer Instruction (PI). Additionally, we offer a description of our classroom observations, which suggests that the use of color-coded A, B, C, D, E voting cards for gathering student answers in class may hold greater pedagogical value and provide a greater potential to gather accurate research results than do the use of clickers or Scantron™ forms.

© 2009 by The American Astronomical Society

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords

astronomy, physics education, teaching, College non-majors, General (applies to all topics), Research into teaching/learning, Teaching approaches

PACS

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1539-1515 (online)

Publisher

$abstract.society.value is a Member of CrossRef by The American Astronomical Society

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 17 June 2008
Published online 19 March 2009
Digital Object Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2009004

    References

  1. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 1999, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academies Press doi:10.1119/1.2895678.
  2. Brissenden, G., Slater, T. F., Mathieu, R., and Nise College Level-One Team. 2001, “The Role Of Assessment In The Development Of The College Introductory Astronomy Course: A “How-To” Guide For Instructors,” Astron. Educ. Rev., 1, 1AERSCZ000001000001000001000001.
  3. Center for Astronomy Education (CAE) 2008, http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.
  4. Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. 2001, “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results,” Am. J. Phys., 69, 970AJPIAS000069000009000970000001.
  5. Deming, G., and Hufnagel, B. 2001, “Who's Taking ASTRO101?” Phys. Teach., 39, 368PHTEAH000039000006000368000001.
  6. diSessa, A. A., Elby, A., and Hammer, D. 2003, “J's Epistemological Stance and Strategies,” in Intentional Conceptual Change, eds. G. Sinatra, and P. Pintrich, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 237.
  7. Dokter, E. F., Brissenden, G., Prather, E. E., and Slater, T. F. 2004, “The Use and Impact of Personal Responder Devices in ASTRO 101,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 36, 681.
  8. Duncan, D. 2005, Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems, San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education Inc.
  9. Duncan, D. K. 2006a, “Success and Failure Using Student Response Systems: `Clickers,'” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 38, 948.
  10. Duncan, D. 2006b, “Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise,” Astron. Educ. Rev., 5, 70AERSCZ000005000001000070000001.
  11. Gerace, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., and Leonard, W. J. 1999, Using Technology to Implement Active Learning in Large Classes, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471419.
  12. Green, P. J. 2002, Peer Instruction for Astronomy, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  13. Kaleta, R., and Joosten, T. 2007, “Student Response Systems: A University of Wisconsin System Study of Clickers,” Educause Center for Applied Research Research Bulletin, 2007, 1.
  14. Lasry, N. 2008, “Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference?” Phys. Teach., 46, 242PHTEAH000046000004000242000001.
  15. Len, P. M. 2006, “Different Reward Structures to Motivate Student Interaction with Electronic Response Systems in Astronomy,” Astron. Educ. Rev., 5, 5AERSCZ000005000002000005000001.
  16. Mazur, E. 1996, Peer Instruction: A Users Manual, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  17. Owens, D. T., Demana, F., Abrahamson, A. L., Meagher, M., and Herman, M. 2002, Developing Pedagogy for Wireless Calculator Networks—and Researching Teacher Professional Development, Final Report. Part 2—Technical Report and Research Description, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED479499.
  18. Pintrich, P. R. 2002, “The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing,” Theory Pract., 41, 219.
  19. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., and Boyle, R. A. 1993, “Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change,” Rev. Educ. Res., 63, 167.
  20. Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., Adams, J. P., Brissenden, G., and CAPER 2008, Lecture-Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy, 2nd Ed., San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  21. Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., Brissenden, G., and Dokter, E. F. 2006, “To Click or Not to Click is Not the Question: How Research with Clickers Develops a Better Understanding of When Learning Happens in Your Classroom,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 38, 948.
  22. Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., Adams, J. P., Bailey, J. M., Jones, L. V., and Dostal, J. A. 2005, “Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non-Science Majors,” Astron. Educ. Rev., 3, 122AERSCZ000003000002000122000001.
  23. Rogers, M. L., and Starrett, D. A. 2006, “Calling All Students…Come In, Students…” in Tomorrow's Professor, ed. R. Reis, http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=757.
  24. Rudolph, A. 2007, “Interactive Learning and `Clickers',” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 38, 949.
  25. Sinatra, G. M., and Pintrich, P. R. 2003, “The Role of Intentions in Conceptual Change Learning,” in Intentional Conceptual Change, eds. G. Sinatra, and P. Pintrich, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1.
  26. Slater, T. F., and Adams, J. P. 2002, Learner Centered Astronomy Teaching: Strategies for ASTRO 101, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.


Close
ADVERTISEMENT

Copyright © 2001 - American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

close